Tung Wah College - - Teaching & Learning - The Centre for Innovative Teaching and Learning (CITL) - I-Cap Student Research Project (I-Cap) - I-Cap Student Research Project - About I-Cap Skip to Content
  • mail
  • blackboard
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • WeChat
  • Search
  • PowerCampus
I-Cap Student Research Project - About I-Cap
Joint Project by:

            


 Home About | Project Team | Project Features | Research Seminars | Resources | News and Events | Photo Gallery


About

Download [ Project information in PDF]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Project Detail~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Participating Institution(s)

                                                              Tung Wah College (Principal Applicant) | Hong Kong Baptist University - School of Continuing Education

Project Category

Theme-based

Project Type

Information System

Grant Approved

$4,407,282 (HKD)

[Click the belowing titles to expand or collapse]

Executive Summary

Most tertiary education institutions in Hong Kong incorporate research projects into their undergraduate curricula. Whether offered in the form of capstone projects, honours projects, final year projects, or dissertations, the aim is to help students to develop critical thinking abilities, academic integrity, information literacy, communication skills, and independence. These skills align with the Generic Level Descriptors in the Hong Kong Education Bureau’s Qualifications Framework and the core skill listed in the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs report. Incorporating research projects into undergraduate education equips students with transferable skills and empowers them to be lifelong learners, critical thinkers, and possibly future researchers.

Tertiary education institutions are also implementing initiatives to support students in conducting rigorous research projects and to foster a research culture for societal advancement. However, teaching students to conduct research can be challenging. The varying areas of competence and wide range of research experiences among teaching staff can affect the consistency of guidance and assessment. Meanwhile, students often face difficulties in navigating the complex research process. Lacking experience and confidence, they can struggle with designing research, gathering and analysing data, and interpreting research findings. Nonetheless, students value the freedom to choose their research topics and appreciate the independent educational process offered by these projects.
To address these challenges, the proposed project will develop and implement ‘I-Cap’: a unique one-stop student research support portal, designed with an integrated–individualised–interactive–intelligent (4-Is) framework to enhance students' research competencies and support supervisors through the teaching and learning process for undergraduate capstone (Cap) projects.

The objectives of the project will be as follows:
• To offer support for supervisors’ teaching and students’ learning of the process of conducting research
• To encourage students to engage in research activities and develop a passion for scholarly inquiry
• To enhance the quality of teaching and learning and help to foster a research culture within the Hong Kong tertiary education sector

The portal will offer convenience and inclusiveness by providing a single platform for accessing various resources related to conducting research. It will cater to different ability levels and learning styles, offering personalized support and enabling students to take charge of their learning. The portal will include text-based manuals, video tutorials, interactive modules, and downloadable templates. Feedback mechanisms will be included for students to provide comments and suggestions for improvement.

Quality assurance mechanisms will be put in place to ensure the portal's quality, effectiveness, and usability. External experts will review the material, instructional approach, and interactive elements. User feedback will be collected through surveys and interviews, and the accessibility and technical functionality of the portal will be evaluated. Ongoing development will be informed by annual user input and comparisons with similar platforms. The one-stop portal will benefit students, educators, academic support services, administrators, institutions, employers, and graduate programmes.

Problem Identified

Most of Hong Kong's tertiary education institutions incorporate a research project into their undergraduate curricula as partial fulfilment of bachelor's degree awards. Research projects can be offered in a variety of forms, such as capstone projects, honours projects, final year projects, or dissertations. Teaching students to conduct research is important because it helps students to develop critical thinking abilities, academic integrity, information literacy, communication skills, and independence. It also helps to prepare students for future academic endeavours and fosters creativity and innovation. These skills and competencies are in line with the Generic Level Descriptors in the Hong Kong Education Bureau’s (2023) Qualifications Framework and the core skills listed in the World Economic Forum's (2023) Future of Jobs report. In general, research instruction in undergraduate education gives students transferable skills and abilities that they can use in their academic and professional endeavours, empowering them to be lifelong learners, critical thinkers, and possibly future researchers.

To promote student research, tertiary educational institutions support academics in enlisting undergraduate students to partake in rigorous research projects to broaden their horizons, improve their research skills, and foster a research culture (e.g., Walkington, 2015). Studies have shown that having undergraduates conduct research can have a significant impact on society; for example, over half of bachelor's degree holders in sociology reported applying their research expertise in their workplaces in areas such as methodological development, research design, data analysis, statistics, and the use of statistical software (e.g., Medley-Rath & Morgan, 2022; Senter, Spalter-Roth, & Van Vooren, 2015; Wilder, 2010). Furthermore, supervisors and students can create new knowledge through these research activities by conducting innovative experiments, studies, and analyses. This helps tertiary education institutions to meet global needs and support intellectual development while advancing society. However, teaching students to conduct research is a pedagogical challenge for supervisors (e.g., Brew & Mantai, 2017; Howard & Brady, 2015), and supervisors are concerned about their students' research experiences (e.g., Linn, Palmer, Baranger, Gerard, & Stone, 2015; Nordsteien, Horntvedt, & Syse, 2017).

The proposed project will develop pedagogical solutions to efficiently and effectively support the undergraduate teaching and learning of research. The project team has already investigated the problems associated with teaching undergraduates to conduct research from the supervisor and student viewpoints. The project team, which is composed of researchers and experienced supervisors, has discussed and shared several such problems from an academic viewpoint. For instance, the project topics, research types, and research designs that students choose are not always aligned with the supervisors’ varying areas of expertise. It can be challenging for supervisors to provide students with clear, concise, and relevant direction because the processes of planning, conducting, and reporting research are complicated and demand a broad variety of competencies. Given that students’ levels of competence vary, a generalised teaching plan might not be suitable for every student. However, the materials that are available to individually support student research are fragmented and scattered, with supervisors unable to access all the resources they need to mentor students from a single location. Furthermore, the wide variety of research and publication experiences possessed by supervisors might influence their interactions with students and their perceptions of what defines excellent research writing. These differences among supervisors may affect students' learning outcomes and make it more difficult to provide a reliable and uniform system of evaluation. The role of supervisors is critical to the success of student research because it can provide step-by-step supervision, teach writing skills, locate relevant information, and develop a systematic research process. In an interview, a young supervisor echoed most of the concerns of the experienced supervisors in the project team regarding the supervision process. Furthermore, it was noted that supervisors must also handle time management concerns, comprehend the significant burden on students, and offer emotional support. These findings are consistent with the literature on this topic (e.g., Linn, et al., 2015).

The project team has also met with seven final-year undergraduate students from various programmes and a fresh graduate to gain a deeper understanding of the student viewpoint. Because the year-long capstone courses do not normally include regular prescheduled classes, students discover that the course design is substantially different from that of their other courses. Students need to take the initiative to report on their progress and meet with their supervisor for direction and assistance, but they can find the complex nature of the research process overwhelming and eventually lose enthusiasm and thus become disengaged. Lacking research experience and essential research skills, they are often sceptical about their capacity to complete all phases of a research project, which include performing a literature review, seeking appropriate sources, critically evaluating information, and selecting an appropriate methodology and design. They are also concerned about collecting sufficient data, using sophisticated analytical methods, and reporting the results. They tend to lack comprehension of ethical issues and to be uncertain of the depth of knowledge that is needed to complete their research projects. Nonetheless, students value the research learning experience and the educational process of carrying out a research project as it encourages them to explore topics of interest, conduct independent research, and take ownership of their learning. These findings echo and support those of recent studies of students' research experiences (e.g., Buchanan & Fisher, 2022; Medley-Rath & Morgan, 2022).

The proposed project will make reference to the nature of conducting research, teachers’ remarks, and undergraduate students’ research experiences to develop and implement ‘I-Cap’: a unique one-stop student research support portal designed with an integrated–individualised–interactive–intelligent (4-Is) framework to enhance students' research learning experience and support supervisors in the teaching process for undergraduate capstone (Cap) projects. The use of a virtual learning environment as a teaching intervention in undergraduate research mentoring has received widespread endorsement (e.g., Hall et al., 2021). This project will aim to offer research support for students and supervisors at every stage of the research process, to improve students' research competencies and supervisors' teaching support, to provide students with an active and engaging learning experience, to increase students' chances of academic success, and to help foster a research culture in the tertiary education sector.

The objectives of the project will be as follows:.
• To offer research support for supervisors’ teaching and students’ learning of the process of conducting research
• To encourage students to engage in research activities and develop a passion for scholarly inquiry
• To enhance the quality of teaching and learning and help to foster a research culture within the Hong Kong tertiary education sector

The I-Cap portal will be developed from a ‘4-Is + Supervisor Support + Community’ framework to provide undergraduate students with a rich and distinctive research learning experience. This framework and the proposed design features are explained below and depicted in the figures in Appendices II and III.
4-Is: Integrated. The portal will serve as a single point of contact for all research support. Students and supervisors will thus be able to quickly acquire resources, support, and guidance for every stage of the research process by visiting a single, easily accessible platform. A well-chosen portal can ensure that all materials available for research support are integrated, coherent, accurate, and up to a particular standard. (Linn et al., 2015). 4-Is: Individualised. Students will have the ability to direct their own learning. The portal will enable students to study independently, revisit information as needed, and examine resources at their own pace. This personalised approach is expected to meet students’ diverse needs and facilitate their learning and skill development by providing them with information relevant to their research stage, research methodology of choice, and proficiency level. The topics and information will be divided into hundreds of micro-knowledge units with different learning styles catered for by a variety of resource formats, such as text-based guides, visual diagrams, video tutorials, interactive exercises, and downloadable templates. 4-Is: Interactive. A variety of learning resource formats, such as practice exercises, quizzes, step-by-step technical guides, and games, will allow students to evaluate their own understanding and provide and receive feedback, as well as will allow students to evaluate their own understanding, provide and receive feedback, and gain first-hand insights into how learning choices can result in rewards or other consequences that engage and motivate them to learn with fun. The feedback systems on the portal will allow students to submit peer comments and suggestions for improvement. 4-Is: Intelligent. The portal will provide support that is specifically designed to answer the issues and queries that students may have during the research process. An embedded AI-chatbot will provide automatic answers to students’ queries and advice and guidance such as learning paths, recommended knowledge units, conceptual diagrams, systematic research planning guides, decision trees for particular research designs and types, ethical informed consent form templates, and searchable validated instruments, with the aim of providing just-in-time support and guidance at every stage of the research process according to students’ needs. Pre-defined Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) serve as the basis for the AI-chatbot's responses, which help with knowledge base construction and training.

Supervisors’ support. Supervisors will find tailor-made resources to help them to mentor students at various levels, such as a library of validated instruments for key constructs and a comprehensive set of short videos on how to use advanced data analytical tools. The administration dashboard will allow supervisors to upload media resources, construct customised learning paths or courses by selecting relevant resources from the portal, and distribute materials to individuals or groups of students. A supervisors’ area on the administration dashboard will allow them to share teaching resources, experience, and best practices. The constant updating of resources and content by supervisors will strengthen and sustain the portal over the long term. Community. The portal will provide a virtual forum in which for students to discuss personal and research-related issues, challenges, and successes to foster a sense of community and provide social and emotional support. All things considered, the one-stop and just-in-time portal will offer efficiency, quality assurance, personalised learning, and convenience, enabling students to successfully build and improve upon their research competences.

Rigorous self-evaluation and quality assurance mechanisms will be adopted to assess, monitor, and improve the portal's overall quality, effectiveness, and usability. External experts will be invited to ensure that the portal covers all relevant topics and encompasses the study types commonly adopted by students in capstone projects, such as scoping reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, secondary data analyses, and quantitative and qualitative studies. The experts will also be tasked with ensuring that the data is accurate, current, and comprehensive. The usage of the portal will be continuously monitored, and feedback will be collected regularly from users for enhancement and improvement. The one-stop I-Cap portal for research support will benefit undergraduate students, educators, academic support services, administrators, institutions, employers, and graduate programmes.

References:
Brew, A., & Mantai, L. (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the challenges and barriers to implementing research-based experiences for undergraduates. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 551-568.
Buchanan, A. J., & Fisher, G. R. (2022). Current Status and Implementation of Science Practices in Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs): A Systematic Literature Review. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4), ar83.
Hall, E., Bailey, E., Higgins, S., Ketcham, C., Nepocatych, S., & Wittstein, M. (2021). Application of the salient practices framework for undergraduate research mentoring in virtual environments. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(1), 1-8.
Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222), 1261757.
Medley-Rath, S., & Morgan, R. (2022). Gaining confidence, experience, and knowledge as researchers among undergraduate sociology students. Teaching Sociology, 50(1), 28-38.
Nordsteien, A., Horntvedt, M. E. T., & Syse, J. (2017). Use of research in undergraduate nursing students' theses: A mixed methods study. Nurse education today, 56, 23-28.
Qualifications Framework. (2023). QF – Generic Level Descriptor (GLD). Retrieved from https://www.hkqf.gov.hk/en/KeyFeatures/levels/index.html
Senter, M. S., Spalter-Roth, R., & Van Vooren, N. (2015). Jobs, careers and sociological skills: The early employment experiences of 2012 sociology majors. February. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Walkington, H. (2015). Students as researchers: Supporting undergraduate research in the disciplines in higher education. The Higher Education Academy, 1, 1-34.
Wilder, E. I. (2010). A qualitative assessment of efforts to integrate data analysis throughout the Sociology curriculum: Feedback from students, faculty, and alumni. Teaching Sociology, 38(3), 226–46.
World Economic Forum (2023). Future of jobs report 2023. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2023.pdf

Project Objectives
Measurable Objectives How it can be achieved
To develop and create the ‘I-Cap’ student research support portal.
Measured by
1. The successful formation of project management, evaluation and production groups;
2. The completion of the portal within the set timeline and its successful operation without any technical glitches.
1. The project team leader and the co-team leaders will be responsible for the overall management of the project, including planning, design, implementation, and evaluation, for the timely completion of the project within the approved budget. Effective management will be enforced, such as clear definitions of objectives, outcomes, and milestones, fair division of labour, reasonable designated timelines, and transparent and close communication between and among different groups.
2. A working group of 6 members from the partner institutions will be formed. The group will include Stanford scientists in the global top 2% and other highly cited researchers and experienced academics teaching or supervising student research projects. They will be responsible for the content development for the student research support portal to ensure quality.
3. An external expert review group will be invited and formed to regularly assess and evaluate the quality of the content development and the usability of the portal.
4. An independent project evaluation team will be formed to regularly monitor and give advice on the progress and the budget of the project and to assess the portal's quality, effectiveness, and usability.
5. The project team will conduct user requirements analysis to collect views from experience researchers, supervisors, students, and IT specialists on the content and the format of the delivery.
6. To guarantee that the portal functions without any problems, the project team will carry out extensive testing prior to launch and offer continuous technical support after launch.
To enhance the quality of teaching and learning of student research through the I-Cap portal.
Measured by
1. Number of unique visitors.
2. Average time spent on the portal.
3. Number of resources accessed or downloaded.
4. Regular training sessions.
5. Pre- and post- implementation questionnaires or surveys to gather feedback from supervisors and students:
• pre-implementation surveys to help to understand their needs and challenges;
• post-implementation surveys to measure the effectiveness of the portal and identify areas for improvement.
1. Monitor the design and the production process to ensure that the portal is user-friendly, allowing supervisors and students to easily find and access the resources they need.
2. Develop a promotional plan to promote access to, downloading of, and use of resources by highlighting their value and providing clear instructions.
3. Regularly update the resources to maintain relevance.
4. Use questionnaires to understand which resources are most valuable to users and focus on enhancing those areas.
5. Organise regular training sessions or workshops for supervisors and students on how to effectively use the portal to enhance their teaching and learning. This will increase their confidence and willingness to use the portal.
6. Regularly conduct questionnaires or surveys to gather feedback from supervisors and students on their experience with the portal. Use this feedback to make improvements and enhancements.
To enhance the support for supervisors’ teaching and supervision of student research through the I-Cap portal.
Measured by
1. Supervisors’ user activity on the portal, obtained by monitoring usage data including frequency of access, number of resources downloaded, and time spent on the portal.
2. Regular surveys to gauge supervisors’ satisfaction with the portal and its impact on their workload. Survey questions will be designed specifically to ask about how the portal enhances supervision preparation.
3. Performance metrics, such as the quality of student research work, student engagement, and student performance. Improvements in these metrics after the launch of the portal will be taken to indicate the effectiveness of the portal.
1. Develop instruction guides for using the portal.
2. Provide a wide range of teaching resources, such as research evaluation and assessment frameworks, grading rubrics, and teaching strategies. These resources will help supervisors to provide relevant guidance and supervision at different stages of the student research process to enhance the quality of teaching and learning and will contribute to a rich student learning experience.
3. Conduct regular training sessions or workshops for supervisors and provide a support system through which supervisors can seek help from the project team to address technical queries, obtain guidance, and foster knowledge sharing.
4. Encourage supervisors to provide feedback and reviews on the portal. Their insights will provide valuable information about how the portal enhances their teaching skill.
To enhance student’s research competencies and experience through the I-Cap portal.
This will include offering research support to students at every stage of the research process, providing students with an active and engaging learning experience that encourages them to engage in research activities and to develop a passion for scholarly inquiry.
Measured by
1. Usage statistics to track the number of research writing resources accessed or downloaded by students. High engagement with these resources will be taken to indicate that students are actively using them to improve their skills.
2. Quality of students’ research papers before and after the implementation of the portal. Noticeable improvements in such aspects as structure, citation, argumentation, and clarity will be taken to indicate the effectiveness of the portal.
3. Student satisfaction surveys conducted to assess students' satisfaction with their improvement in research writing skills. The questions will focus on their perceived improvement and the usefulness of the portal's resources in enhancing their skills.
1. Invite external experts to review and evaluate the comprehensiveness of the research support resources. This will ensure that the portal gives access to a wide range of resources specifically tailored for student research. These are likely to include guides on different types of research forms, qualitative and quantitative research design and data analysis methods, citation styles, structuring a research paper, and other aspects of research to promote academic integrity and research ethics and foster critical thinking skills.
2. Ensure that the '4-Is' (integrated–individualised–interactive–intelligent) of the I-Cap portal framework are implemented in the design and production of the portal.
3. Monitor the delivery of content from a pedagogical perspective, ensuring that the portal incorporates interactive learning tools such as quizzes, simulations, or games that can make the learning process more engaging and effective. These tools will be designed to focus on different aspects of research writing.
4. Maintain the quality of the intelligent responses, ensuring that pre-defined Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) will serve as the basis for the AI-chatbot's responses, which help with knowledge base construction and training.
5. Ensure that the portal provides personalised and just-in-time guidance for individual learners at different levels of competence and for different stages of the student research process.
6. Ensure that the portal implements a feature that allows supervisors to provide personalized feedback on student research. This will help students to understand their strengths and areas for improvement.
7. Conduct regular workshops or webinars on various aspects of student research to give guidance to students on relevant resources. These will be beneficial for students wanting to improve their research writing skills.
8. Collect regular feedback from students to understand their needs and challenges. This feedback will be used to continuously improve and update the portal's resources and features.
To enhance the quality of teaching and learning and to foster a research culture within the tertiary education sector.
Measured by
1. Number of visits by the public. The number of visits to the portal from local and non-local visitors will be tracked. An increase in the number of visits will be taken to indicate higher public engagement.
2. Feedback and comments received from the public. These will provide valuable insights into public perceptions of the portal and its resources.
1. Maintain selected information, selected capstone projects/honours projects, public research seminars, training workshops, and an external resource list for public access. Ensure these resources are high-quality, relevant, and regularly updated.
2. Promote the portal and its publicly accessible information through various channels, such as social media, newsletters, and collaborations with other tertiary educational institutions or platforms.
3. Regularly gather feedback from the local tertiary education sector to understand its needs and challenges. This feedback will be used to continuously improve and update the portal's resources and features.
4. Ensure scalability and adaptability by including a backend content administration dashboard that educators and supervisors can use to continuously scale and adapt the content to meet the needs of different institutions, disciplines, or educational contexts.

 

Project Deliverables
Deliverables Sharing mechanism
‘I-Cap’ student research support portal content
The content will aim to achieve the core integrated–individualised–interactive–intelligent features provided by the portal and will include:
1.1. text-based documents in mini knowledge units, covering all important topics in the student research process, including analytical writing skills, searching and selecting a research topic and relevant literature, citation styles, methods and designs, qualitative and quantitative designs, qualitative and statistical data analysis strategies and applications, and research ethics.
1.2. text-based documents or diagrams designed to provide advice and guidance in the form of recommended learning essentials and pathways.
1.3. multimedia and interactive tutorials, especially featuring step-by-step guides to sophisticated data analytical applications (at least 30 short videos).
1.4. games designed for each topic (not more than 15 games).
1.5. quizzes and interactive exercises designed for each knowledge unit or learning pathway.
1.6. a library of validated instruments for important constructs (at least 30 instruments).
1.7. research evaluation and assessment frameworks and rubrics or standardized assessment tools.
1.8. portal user manuals, FAQs, and portal training workshops teaching materials.
Local Hong Kong self-financing institutions will be able to access selected resources, workshops and seminars, news, and a showcase of student capstone projects through the portal’s public access section. This will not only give recognition to the students for their hard work but also allows local Hong Kong self-financing institutions to understand the quality of research being conducted at the institution. It will allow for the sharing of best practices and help to create a community of practice for research writing educators.
I-Cap student research support portal website
All senior students and supervisors will be enrolled into the portal. Supervisors and students will be able to use their institutional email address to access the portal and engage in self-regulated learning to save, share, and access resources.
The portal website (an online cloud-based platform) will include:
2.1. a comprehensive content management system with blog function for articles and multimedia information (text, image, animation, banner).
2.2. sophisticated slideshow and pull-down menu items.
2.3. customisable module arrangement on front page.
2.4. backend content administration dashboard for supervisors to edit and update all content types.
2.5. website security protection with firewall and Captcha.
2.6. SEO compliance framework for major search engines and social network sharing.
2.7. learning management system (LMS) integration with Moodle or Blackboard so that users’ account information and assessment grades can be retrieved or saved to the LMS.
2.8. self-regulated learning features for students, including progress report, social features, reminders and feedback, collaborative tools and discussion forum (among peer learners), games, interactive quizzes, and searchable library of validated instruments.
2.9. collaborative tools for supervisors to easily share documents and resources with students or download resources to prepare teaching materials.
2.10. a news and updates section for reporting achievements of students or supervisors, upcoming events, new resources, news about the latest research methods and design or data analytical tool, etc.
2.11. a public resource section for public access to open education resources.
2.12. iOS and Android mobile applications for supervisors and students providing the frontend view of the portal website.
• Local Hong Kong self-financing institutions will be able to access the content and the portal: each institution will only need to pay a small, fixed amount to install the system for their own institution.
• The portal will include a backend content administration dashboard for educators and supervisors to continuously scale and adapt the content to meet the needs of different institutions, disciplines, or educational contexts.
• Local Hong Kong self-financing institutions will be able to access selected resources, workshops and seminars, news, and a showcase of student capstone projects through the portal’s public access section. This will not only give recognition to the students for their hard work but also allow the local Hong Kong self-financing institutions to understand the quality of research being conducted at the institution. It will allow the sharing of best practices and help to create a community of practice for research writing educators.
Public research seminars, a launch event and training workshops to promote the I-Cap portal and enhance its application by supervisors and students.
3.1. Six research seminars organized on different research topics, with renowned research scholars invited to present. The seminars will be recorded to form part of the portal resources. They will provide insights into emergent trends and best practices in academia, enhancing the research competencies of students and inspiring supervisors.
3.2. A launch event to promote the adoption and the use of the portal. The event will introduce the portal to students and educators at participating institutions and other interested self-financing institutions to make them aware of and familiar with the portal’s functionalities and resources. The launch event will introduce the design principles of the portal and the rich support resources and provide a demonstration on how to effectively use the portal for student research support. The event may also arouse the interest of other self-financing institutions in incorporating the portal into their curriculum.
3.3. At least 2 internal training workshops at each participating institution with training materials such as user guides, video tutorials, and FAQs developed to assist users in navigating the portal. These materials will be made available on the portal for easy access.
- If the speakers give their consent, research seminars will be recorded. These recordings will be placed in the public access section alongside training workshop recordings, user manuals, and video tutorials. This will help to create a community of practice for student researchers and educators in the local tertiary education sector.
- Throughout the project's duration, information about the activities that have been arranged can be shared and promoted on relevant Education Bureau websites. In particular, everyone will be invited to participate in the research writing seminars, including interested parties from local tertiary institutions.
- During the project and after its completion, marketing materials that introduce the teaching and learning resources of the student research support I‐Cap portal can be shared and promoted on relevant Education Bureau websites. These materials will specifically include selected open access
resources, research writing seminars recordings, news, updates, and exemplars of research work.
The systematic evaluation of the portal.
4.1. Feedback will be regularly gathered from all users (students, educators, and the public) at different stages of the design, development, production, and testing of the portal. This will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and usability of the portal.
4.2. Assessment of the learning outcomes of students using the portal. This will be done by setting tests or assignments that measure changes in students’ research writing skills.
4.3. Regular reviews of the project deliverables to ensure that they are meeting the project objectives and are on track for successful completion.
- User feedback and system improvement updates will be summarised and brief reports will be shared to the public through news items in the public access section.
- The evaluation summaries may be shared, including with local tertiary institutions, during the project and after its completion by uploading them to relevant Education Bureau websites.
Implementation Schedule
Project Period  
Milestone 1            
Milestone 2            
Milestone 3            
Milestone 4            
                                                                                               

 

Month In terms of Project Activities and Deliverables In terms of Monitoring and Evaluation
1-6 In the preparation, planning, and implementation processes, the project team will
• Form a working group, an external expert review group, and a project evaluation team;
• Conduct user requirement analysis on the content and format of the research writing resources;
• Prepare a content outline and devise key milestones for content development;
• Prepare the tendering process for portal development vendors;
• Hold the first and second research seminars, which will be recorded for embedding into the portal [Publicity Plan S/N 4];
• Create a project webpage at the participating institutions and a Facebook fan page for the project. [Publicity Plan S/N 1, S/N 2, S/N 8]
• All staff and students of participating institutions will receive an internal email listing the project specifics and acknowledging the Quality Enhancement Support Scheme.[Publicity Plan S/N 3 & S/N 10]
The project team will
• Hold quarterly working group meetings to monitor the progress of content development;
• Regularly solicit advice and comments from the external expert review group at each milestone of the content development;
• Establish fair deadlines to assign content development tasks to the working group;
• Report on the progress for the 1st and 2nd quarters to the project team, the project evaluation team, and the Education Bureau.
7-12 • Appoint a portal production vendor;
• Complete the topic knowledge unit and individualised learning pathway guidance content development;
• Hold the third and fourth research seminars, which will be recorded for embedding into the portal [Publicity Plan S/N 4];
• Conduct a user survey on the proposed content (first evaluation);
• Publish news and updates through participating institutions’ websites and the Facebook fan page. [Publicity Plan S/N 8]
• Hold quarterly working group meetings to monitor the progress of content development;
• Conduct and solicit reviews of topic content by the project team, working group, and external expert;
• Report on the progress for the third and fourth quarters to the project team, the project evaluation team, and the Education Bureau.
13-18 • Start portal design;
• Complete the portal prototype;
• Complete 50% multimedia, interactive, and chatbot knowledge-base content where pre-defined FAQs will serve as the basis for AI-chatbotresponses for knowledge-base construction and training;
• Hold the fifth and sixth research seminars, which will be recorded for embedding into the portal [Publicity Plan S/N 4];
• Publish news and updates through participating institutions’ websites and the Facebook fan page. [Publicity Plan S/N 8]
• Hold quarterly working group meetings to monitor the progress of the multimedia content development;
• Conduct and solicit reviews of the portal prototype by stakeholders,including the project team and working group;
• Report on the progress for the fifth and sixth quarters to the project team, the project evaluation team, and the Education Bureau.
19-24 • Complete 100% of the multimedia, interactive, and chatbot knowledge-base content;
• Complete portal production for UAT testing;
• Conduct and solicit reviews of UAT by the project working group, external expert review group, and selected student representatives;
• Pilot the portal with one class from each participating institution;
• Hold a training workshop for the pilot classes;
• Conduct user satisfaction surveys with students, supervisors, and the external expert review group (second evaluation);
• Enhancement of portal functionalities;
• Publish news and updates through participating institutions’ websites and the Facebook fan page. [Publicity Plan S/N 8]
• Hold quarterly working group meetings to monitor the progress of the multimedia content development;
• Conduct and solicit reviews and comments on portal design by the project team, working group, external expert review group, and final-year students;
• Report on the progress for the seventh and eighth quarters to the project team, the project evaluation team, and the Education Bureau.
25-30 • Hold the second internal training workshop for participating institutions to arouse their interest in and awareness of the portal;
• Conduct pre-and post-implementation surveys on students’ satisfaction and academic performance;
• Conduct post-launch surveys on supervisors’ satisfaction;
• Monitor usage patterns;
• Enhance portal functionalities, content, and interactive designs;
• Publish news and updates through participating institutions’ websites and the Facebook fan page. [Publicity Plan S/N 8]
• Hold quarterly working group meetings to monitor the progress of content development;
• Report on the progress for the ninth and tenth quarters to the project team, the project evaluation team, and the Education Bureau.
31-36 • Launch the portal for all students and supervisors in the participatinginstitutions and local self-financing institutions [Publicity Plan S/N 4 & S/N 5];
• Conduct user survey and focus group interviews with students and supervisors for continuous enhancement of the portal (third evaluation);
• Publish news and updates through participating institutions’ websites and the Facebook fan page. [Publicity Plan S/N 8]
• The project team will actively take part in any publicity, promotion, and dissemination efforts for the project that are coordinated or hosted by the Secretariat. [Publicity Plan S/N 6]
•The project team will attend seminars, workshops, and other events upon invitation to share their ideas and details of the project. [Publicity Plan S/N 7]
• Upon request from the Secretariat, the project team will provide publicity materials to be posted on the Education Bureau’s website and connected websites. [Publicity Plan S/N 9]
• Hold quarterly working group meetings to monitor the progress ofthe content enhancement and updates;
• Report on the progress for the 11th and 12th quarters to the project team and project evaluation team;
• Prepare the final evaluation report and final financial report for delivery to the Education Bureau.

                                 

Publicity Plan
Cash Flow and Budget

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Project Expenditure~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[Amount in HK$]

 

Month

1-6

Month

7-12

Month

13-18

Month

19-24

Month

25-30

Month

31-36

Total

Manpower 504,041 530,816 697,175 318,347 485,121 334,335 2,869,835
Services 0 0 654,000 408,000 216,000 0 1,278,000
General Expenses 29,000 9,000 19,000 0 10,000 1,500 68,500
Others(e.g. auditor's fee) 0 42,435 0 42,435 0 106,077 190,947
Total 533,041 582,251 1,370,175 768,782 711,121 441,912 4,407,282

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Project Income~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[Amount in HK$]

 

Month

1-6

Month

7-12

Month

13-18

Month

19-24

Month

25-30

Month

31-36

Total

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grant Sought Under the Quality Enhancement Support Scheme (HK$): 4,407,282
Funding From Other Sources (HK$): 0
Total Project Value (HK$): 4,407,282

 

~~~~~~~~~~Duty list of manpower to be funded by this project~~~~~~~~~~

Post Duty
Project​ Assistant [1]​​​​​​ - To help implementation of the project under the supervision of the
project team leader;
- To help to setup regular meetings and be secretary for the various project
stakeholder groups;
- To assist to maintain documentations, separate book of accounts and
financial records for the project and to assist project team leader to
report regularly;
- To assist to promote the project inside the participating institutions and
to the public that aims for high awareness and participation rate; and
- To assist to collect evidence for evaluation, including feedbacks, usage
statistics, and so on, for continuous improvement and enhancement
Programmer (in the rank of project officer) [1] - To support the development of the student research support portal with
respect to the integrated, individualised, interactive, intelligent features;
- To work closely with project team and stakeholders to understand user
needs, analyse project requirements and translate them into software
specifications;
- To collaborate with portal production vendor to design software technical
structure and architecture;
- To develop software solutions based on project requirements, using
programming languages, frameworks, and development tools; and
- To be responsible for writing, testing, and maintaining software code
Project Team Leader Teaching Relief [1] - To develop the overall project planning, effective implementation and
regular evaluation;
- To assemble and manage the project team and to coordinate and
communicate with various project stakeholder groups;
- To identify potential risks and develop strategies to mitigate them;
- To ensure that the project meets quality standards and adheres to
defined processes and procedures; and
- To maintain project documentation and generate regular reports to the
project evaluation team and the EDB for project status and performance
Co‐team Leader, Research, Teaching Relief [1] - To collaborate on developing the project plan, defining project goals,
objectives, and strategies;
- To lead and manage the working group, including task assignment,
performance monitoring, and development;
- To monitor research support resources development; and
- To oversee the overall quality of the student research support resources
Co‐team Leader, Coordinator of Partner Institution Teaching Relief [1] - To collaborate on developing the project plan, defining project goals,
objectives, and strategies;
- To coordinate and communicate with partner institution project team and
working group, including task assignment, performance monitoring, and
development;
- To oversee the procurement, design, production of the student research
support portal; and
- To implement the evaluation mechanisms to ensure the overall quality of
the student research support portal
Working Group Teaching Relief [6] - To actively participate in project team meetings, discussions and
brainstorming sessions, offer ideas and insights to contribute to the
success of the project;
- To be responsible for completing the tasks assigned to them within the
project plan and timeline, ensuring high‐quality work; and
- To be a member of the working group to support student research
support resources development
Student Helpers [2] - To support the six research seminars and the launching event at the event
days;
- To assist with the registration process; guide attendees with seating
arrangement; serve as a point of contact for enquiries; assist speakers;
keep track of time and schedule; help with setup and dismantling of
equipment, facilities and furniture; provide guidance and assistance to
attendees throughout the event; assist in collecting feedback; and assist
with any other tasks that may arise during the events

 

Project Sustainability

After the project is completed in three years, the student research support ‘I‐Cap’ portal will be
integrated into the partner institutions’ management to ensure its operation, annual maintenance, and
continuous updating and enhancement by the Centre for Innovative Teaching and Learning at Tung Wah
College, and Research Management Office at the School of Continuing Education, Hong Kong Baptist
University. The project team leader at Tung Wah College will be responsible for coordinating any interested
self‐financing institutions in using the portal.

To sustain the student research support I‐Cap portal (The amount is listed in the attached portal development quotation):
1. The portal website annual maintenance: $10,000.00/year/portal
2. Cloud‐based webhosting: $36,000.00/year/portal
3. iOS mobile app annual maintenance: $10,000.00/year
4. Android mobile app annual maintenance: $10,000.00/year
Total: $66,000.00/year/portal

These are the total costs to maintain the portal, and the mobile apps in full operation.
The portal design includes a backend content administration dashboard such that educators and
supervisors can continuously update the content to scale and adapt to meet the needs of different
institutions, disciplines, or educational contexts.

Project at Concourse for self-fiancing Post-scondary Education [Link]

 



Tung Wah College Logo
King’s Park Campus
Ma Kam Chan Memorial Building,
31 Wylie Road, Homantin, Hong Kong
Mongkok Campus
Cheung Kung Hai Memorial Building, 90A,
and Cheung Chin Lan Hong Building, 98,
Shantung Street, Mongkok, Hong Kong
Kwai Hing Campus
16/F, Tower 2,
Kowloon Commerce Centre,
51 Kwai Cheong Road,
Kwai Chung, Hong Kong
Tsim Sha Tsui Campus
136A, Nathan Road,
Kowloon, Hong Kong
General Enquiries:
Tel:
(852) 3190 6678

Email:
[email protected]
Admission Enquiries:
Tel:
(852) 3190 6672

Email:
[email protected]